Tuesday 31 May 2016

Coercive tobacco control health promotion: the curious case of Mayor Duterte


News of Davao City, Philippines Mayor Rodrigo Duterte, who is running for the Presidential election, has warranted international media attention and sparked global outrage for his contentious comments regarding an Australian rape victim. This instance sheds light on the character portrayal the media capitalizes on. His strategy of being portrayed in a threatening light has been thought to have resulted in his success in managing Davao City.[1]

Before garnering worldwide attention for his racy remarks, Mayor Duterte was positively regarded for his work in making Davao City smoke-free by various organizations, including the World Health Organization. It is widely known that tobacco is a leading cause of death, illness and impoverishment; tobacco is a wicked policy problem. But, Mayor Duterte has employed a unique solution to tobacco control by utilizing his reputation as a ‘feared’ leader to coerce citizens into quitting and refraining from using tobacco products. A prime example is the city’s billboards depicting the mayor crushing a cigarette in his fist.

It is understood that fear tactics should be used carefully when seeking to achieve long-term behavioural change; since fear tactics evoke immediate emotion in individuals and if executed improperly the associated lessons generally do not carry out into behavioural change in the long-term. Despite this knowledge, fear tactics have succeeded in making Davao City the first 100 percent smoke-free city in Southeast Asia.[2]

Protection Motivation Theory provides a theoretical understanding of successful fear tactics. According to the theory, individuals gauge both their threat and coping appraisals. When both the threat (i.e. health dangers of smoking) and coping (i.e. self-efficacy to overcome a smoking addiction) appraisals are high, the individual has a high protection motivation, resulting in the fear tactic messaging having an effect on the individual.[3]

Mayor Duterte’s strategy aligns with the Protection Motivation Theory, as the threat appraisal is high since people are afraid of the mayor and he may have enforcement elements (such as: social, political, or police) that act to emphasize his influence. In fact, it has been well demonstrated that the most effective tobacco control measures are coercive and not voluntary (for example, regulatory by-laws banning smoking in public places).

Granted, fear tactics likely worked alongside other tobacco policy tools creating a comprehensive approach to tobacco control in Davao City, resulting in the decline in tobacco consumption prevalence.

Despite the negative attention Mayor Duterte has received, his work highlights the tremendous impact a coercive political leader can play in influencing health outcomes by championing health. It also further warrants research to explore cultural considerations in employing health promotion models of change. Perhaps certain types of strategies work better than others in Asian contexts, which may lead to consideration of alterations to some existing health promotion models of change.




[1] http://www.filipinewsph.com/2016/04/veteran-lawyer-backs-duterte-over-rape-joke.html?m=1
[2] “Davao City first smoke-free Metropolitan City in Southeast Asia”. (2013, July 29). Tempo: News in a Flash. Retrieved on March 28, 2015 from: http://www.tempo.com.ph/2013/07/29/davao-city-first-smoke-freemetropolitan-city-in-southeast-asia/
[3] Rogers, R. W. & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Handbook of health behavior research 1: Personal and social determinants. (pp. 113-132). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press, xxviii, 505 pp.


No comments:

Post a Comment